Liberals: The true architects of modern chaos.

For years now, especially since both the right and the left have radicalized, we have observed a political and social dialogue that is nothing short of insane—where people no longer discuss ideas but instead hurl accusations at one another. If you look at what’s happening, on the right they say those on the left are terrorists, while on the left they retort that those on the right are Nazis. Discussing things constructively is no longer an option, because any proposal becomes just another battlefield where insults are traded in every possible way.

But how did we get to this point? Because when I was a teenager, and even up until before Trump, politics always lived on dialogue. There were different parties with different visions, but the leaders always maintained politeness and respect toward others that allowed for communication and reaching an agreement. Now, 그 grace has vanished, leaving room only for verbal violence and mutual deafness.

As incredible as it may seem, Trump is not the source of the problem; regardless of the claims that he is, he isn't. Sure, he accelerated the process, but the wheels were set in motion without him.

The real monster we see every single day was created by the liberal side of the world—namely, all those left-wing factions that, when they were in government, thought only of two things: inclusion and the climate. This has led the world into a drama that will be difficult to resolve.

Liberals and Inclusion.

Honestly, I don't know when this madness started, but at a certain point, left-wing movements, backed by governments themselves, pushed for total inclusivity: accepting anyone and making them part of society in the same way. Furthermore, this concept eventually came to mean welcoming immigration without any rules, because "everyone was welcome." All of this created an enormous rift between liberals and conservatives; and this time, the latter were—and are—right.

Let’s start with the integration of minorities. Why should I do it at any cost? I am not against the principle itself, but there must be a context. Forcing it is not only stupid but also harmful, because it always seems to be a one-way street: the white heterosexual community must include within itself realities like the LGBT community or ethnic minorities. Question: Does the opposite happen? Do these realities integrate the white heterosexual majority? No, they don’t. Minorities can enjoy their privileges as such, but I cannot exercise my majority privileges.

Take "Pride Month," for example. For the entire month of June, the world must celebrate gay and trans people. Why should I celebrate something that doesn't belong to me and doesn't interest me? Why isn't there a month to celebrate being straight? I can't, because otherwise, I offend a sensitive LGBT community. Well, seeing men dressed in obscene ways offends me too, yet I have to accept it because "it's the celebration of the minority!" I'm not okay with that.

Not to mention immigration. I perfectly understand that, politically, it is fundamental to support the fiscal, labor, and pension systems. But accepting anyone just because "poor soul, they suffered through war" is not right. A state cannot and must not welcome everyone: it cannot because space and resources are lacking; it must not because an uncontrolled flow is a cost that the community cannot and should not have to afford.

This has led conservatives, who see traditions and religion as cornerstones, to fear for the future, seeing the values that made their nation great crumbling in favor of principles that shouldn't even exist. The result has been a protest against liberals who, from their positions of government power, ignored conservative concerns. The latter, fueled by fear and anger, thus began to support and vote for violent and radical right-wing movements.

One cannot accept everyone just because they are weak and defenseless. I’m sorry, but there is an internal balance and security to maintain. If people are let in without control, the risk of degeneration and violence is extremely high. We have been experiencing this firsthand every day for at least ten years.

Liberals and the Climate.

The climate has been another major problem, and it still is. That damn Greta Thunberg, instead of going to school like all teenagers, started skipping classes on Fridays to protest against an absent climate policy that was driving the weather crazy. A noble gesture? Yes, if you know how to manage it once it becomes massive.

Instead, while the movement grew day by day, what could have been a moment of constructive dialogue to achieve a clean world for future generations ran aground. Greta went to the United Nations to lash out at the entire world, using words and tones unsuitable for a political setting. Moreover, under the guise of "they aren't listening to us," she fueled an aggressive rhetoric (based on slogans like "we are dying" or "we must do everything and do it now") that radicalized her followers. If today we have activists gluing themselves to the asphalt in Germany or defacing monuments across Europe, it is due to this almost guerrilla-like communication adopted by both her movement and other groups linked to "Fridays for Future."

The incredible thing is that nations fell for the trick. Every government embraced the idea of "green energy" as something necessary that would save the planet. The cycle was unbelievable: as soon as we had an environmental disaster, it was immediately linked to climate change, which further fanned the flames of the activists, putting even more pressure on governments, which invested more and more money, accelerating at a frantic pace. For years, we passively accepted that Greta and her followers were right, both in substance and in tone. Every industrialized nation embarked on this mad race to become "climate neutral" by 2050. Before the Covid-19 pandemic, it seemed like a feasible goal—after all, we were talking about a thirty-year timeframe. In reality, it never was, unless one wanted to destroy their own economy, which is exactly what is happening.

Do you know what the funny thing is? Right now, in 2026, the great powers have noticed how this aggressive and violent policy is leading nowhere, except toward ruining the entire economy. In fact, governments are backtracking. They have finally realized that all this haste to be ecological at any cost is harmful: without a concrete plan, you only produce rubble. Let’s hope that from this year onward, a sustainable pace for the transition can be maintained.

Small Reflections.

Liberals, supporters of inclusivity at any cost and of an ideological environmentalism, have thrown the world into confusion. This group, small but very loud, represents a slice of society that is radicalizing its conservative counterpart, which is forced to fight for its own survival. Since liberals seized power and obtained platforms from which to scream, they have produced nothing but damage. Take the example of Disney: since the company adopted "woke" doctrine, it has lost a billion dollars at the box office with colossal flops, including the entire Marvel production and the controversial Snow White film, where an actress of color was chosen to play a historically white character.

This drift risks leading us to ruin because it is founded on the ignorance of those who allow themselves to be conditioned by anyone and demand that the latest trend of the moment become the law of the land.

I am deeply sorry to see the liberal world reduced to this state. In the past, liberals were always the driving force of change and, thanks to a proper mental balance, allowed society to take extraordinary steps forward. Now, however, they have become a danger to stability, undermining the very foundations of what constitutes a state. Even more serious is that anyone who dares to oppose them is immediately labeled a Nazi, racist, or homophobe, even if they are a balanced and inclusive person who simply loathes these excesses.

M.